Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones
I'm fine with that, but if that's the case that should never have been a condition of his reinstatement. Deferring to the terms of his probation and then suspending him before it's been determined that he did violate his probation is unfair.
Was that a condition of his reinstatement? I'm scouring the web and all I've come up with is that the reinstatement stipulated he had to comply with the terms of his three year court-issued probation.
|
I'm speculating here, apologies if I didn't make that clear.
I don't know if there were specific terms or if there was a blanket warning to the tune of "should it become public that you committed any actions to the detriment of the image of the NFL your reinstatement will be reconsidered"
Goodell is fully empowered and feeling it. He may be taking the SCOTUS definition of pornography on what is a suspendable offense.