Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc
Just saw it. I loved it, I thought it was a perfect continuation/resolution of the events of Casino Royale and the continued evolution of the new Bond (as a character).
What I didn't love was the way the action sequences were edited...
I also thought it was a little short. The end, especially, seemed rushed (the part in the desert, not the part in russia; that part rung perfect for me....) and there were some leaps in logic that I thought should have been fleshed out.
But, all in all, in no way was that a bad movie. It's going in the collection as soon as it's out on DVD.
Craig owns that role now. He's the definitive James Bond. I never thought anybody could take that from Connery (or Lazenby, as some think). I was wrong.
Can't wait to see where they go from here.
|
I agree whole-heartedly about Daniel Craig... and the editing of the action sequences.
Everything else... not so much.