Quote:
Originally Posted by smittysbar
I get it, but it just seems to me he is not wanting to get his hands dirty firing his buddy. I think he thought about this a while back. Maybe not but that is how it comes across a little to me.
|
What message do you think Cleveland is sending to GMs they're interviewing that "we're looking to hire you for GM, but we're already looking to make the coaching decision without you."
Clark's on the right track here. A GM should be allowed to bring in his own guys. And I think it sends a really good message to prospective GMs that Clark Hunt has stuck true to his word that the GM, not Clark Hunt, would decide who our next coach will be.
Why do people want us to interview coaches without a GM? And why would anyone want to rush the GM decision just to start interviewing coaches?
Yes, it's an unfortunate situation, but it's the right one.