Quote:
Originally Posted by siberian khatru
I don't see how they can keep Herm.
1) You can't keep him on a 1-year contract as a lame duck.
.
.
.
.
|
Why? Why is coaching the last year of your contract with no extension in place yet considered to be "lame duck"? Who made that up?
Why is everyone so convinced that a coach won't play out the last year of his contract? That makes very little sense to me. This idea has been thrown around for a bit now, and it seems like everyone is taking this idea as accepted truth. But I don't see it that way. I don't see that it's so crazy for a coach to continue in the last year of his contract without everyone around him running for the hills. That's silly. It's not a requirement that you have to have an extension in place before you coach the last year of your current contract. Especially if you're a coach that has only won 6 games in the last 2 seasons.
Everyone has seemed to accept that he'll either be fired or get an extension. Either or. But I don't think that's the only possible outcome at all...