Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots
You can't talk QB philosophy on this board without someone bringing Cassel/Sanchez in to the whole thing. And nine times out of ten, it's going to be the same crowd that has been running like roaches to crackers, to get there first and fast, to make sure you understand that Cassel was the best choice for the Chiefs for the 500th ****ing time.
Didn't you and I discuss this very topic a few weeks ago? Didn't you tell me I should take the high road?
Since then, I've done nothing but acknowledge that he is in fact the Chiefs quarterback, I hope he does well, and I've laid out a minimum of an expectation of five measly, Vegas-odds wins from the guy.
And has it changed a ****ing thing in this Ass Zoo?
No. No it has not.
I, unlike you, don't believe that Cassel CAN'T become a Top 5. LIKE You however, I believe that Sanchez has a better chance at becoming a Top 5 based on the criteria and skill set that we've discussed five billion times before. And I'm willing to bet a lifetime IP ban against anyone who wants to step up against me and say that I'm wrong.
That doesn't however mean that I want Cassel, or more importantly( MOST important as a matter of fact )the Chiefs TO LOSE.
Some people apparently can not grasp this.
|
What the **** are all these words? This thread WAS about Cassel and has stayed about Cassel. Who is running to talk about Sanchez in this thread? People are arguing that blaming that loss to the Jets on Cassel is absolutely absurd, and that he did indeed come through in the clutch, which is what franchise QBs do.
I just reread your ramblings halfway through typing this, and honestly, what the **** are you on? Do you EVER make any kind of sense?