Quote:
|
I think it's fair to say that unless you have a glorious NFL resume as a coach, GM, or owner, then your opinion is worth jack shit. Pioli spent almost a decade partnered with one of the best coaches in NFL history. On top of that, his father-in-law is ALSO one of the best coaches in NFL history. I'm pretty sure Pioli has a good football mind. Bob Kraft thought so, too.
|
The great thing about football is the passage of time virtually proves all decisions one way or the other.
I suppose thus far you think:
A: Passing on Sanchez was a good idea? (That ones not looking good so far)
B: Drafting a 5 technique #3 was a good idea? (Neither is that one)
C: Leaving your right tackle position in the hands of practice squad fodder was a good idea? (That surely isn't looking good)
D: Giving a backup QB a $60 million extension when you had an entire year to evaluate him was a good idea? (Nope)
E: Forcing an offensive coordinator on your head coach even though you knew their philosophies differed was a good idea? (Definitely not)
F: Hiring the statistically worst defensive coordinator in the NFL over the past 3 years to run your defense was a good idea? (We'll see, but it ain't looking good so far)
G: Forcing a defensive scheme that none of your existing talent had played in was a good idea? (Perhaps)
H: Taking over the worst pass rushing team in NFL history and not bringing in a single pass rusher was a good idea? (I suppose Hali has proved himself a viable threat, hasn't he?)
Those are just off the top of my head.
Some may pan out. But I think it's fair to say there are enough major question marks that skepticism need not be defended.