Quote:
Originally Posted by irishjayhawk
Right, he's serviceable. But I'd hardly call him an MLB talent.
But we agree on the bold.
|
Think we're debating semantics.
He's a contributing player on most teams in the league, and a clear positive (overall and when used properly) for a dog shit team like the Royals.
Serviceable/playable/ML talent...these are all about the same to me.