Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
The difference is that several years ago, Perry was a first round pick.
The guy was very effective a few years ago. He was averaging 5 yards per carry for 2 seasons, even if not at a full carry load. Most of you are judging him based on one poor season coming back from major knee surgery.
I don't understand the reluctance. What is there seriously to lose?
(crickets)
If he sucks, as he did in 2008, then you can him. If he plays well, then you keep him and suddenly you can cross RB off your priority list.
I don't understand the absolute reluctance to bring in a guy who is a zero-risk addition. There is no downside to signing him. Zero. Nothing but upside.
|
It's not like the Chiefs have the upperhand on all of the other teams. Read this..
Quote:
|
"Perry was drafted by the UFL's Orlando Tuskers over the summer.
|
31 other teams have not brought him in for a look.