Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Holy shit, you know who actually does that?
The director of college scouting. That was Dimitroff's job, not Pioli's.
Furthermore, that excerpt says or implies nothing about the work that Pioli does, only that he creates an unhappy work atmosphere by portraying his boss as some kind of tyrant.
How does that, in any way, say anything about him scouting or doing extra work?
Are you on mescaline?
|
Who was managed by Scott Pioli.
And yes, the article clearly shows that Pioli was pushing to get things done. I don't agree with his style. And yes, the article scared the shit out of me b/c I don't like the culture he's bringing into KC.
But the fingerpointing is getting ridiculous. Doesn't credit and blame always start from up top? When did it become the case that Directors were getting more credit than the VPs and GMs? Pioli managed the entire scouting network. That includes Dimitroff.
A lot of Carl Peterson's failures were due to giving too much power to Lynn Stiles to run his personnel. And for not firing Chuck Cook. That's his fault for not micro-managing them better. I've never seen an organization where the lower-level guy gets more credit than the upper-level guy.