Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan
so anytime anybody is ever wrong about anything are you just going to play the hindsight card?
the pick was ****ing stupid in April, the minute the ****ing pick was anounced it was ****ing stupid thats what this thread is all about.
oh its not just about sanchez either. i said it right in this thread the day of the pick, the pick was stupid and i didnt even want sanchez. this has nothing to do with sanchez, it has to do with the people who we're sucking off pioli the DAY OF the draft and acting like we just won the lottery even though all the signs were there the DAY OF the draft that it was ****ing idiotic
|
No. If you wanted Sanchez, Raji, or Crabtree instead of Jackson, that's fine. But when people start talking about alternatives to Jackson that fell well past #3, that's using hindsight as an argument.
And you have no ****ing idea if Jackson was a good/bad pick. He's a rookie for christ sake.
If Jackson plays to a very high level next year, while it may never end up being a great pick, it certainly won't be a bad pick.