Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
That's not critical thinking, that's an assumption.
Thinking critically about Cassel would be something like this:
Is Weis going to help Cassel actually become a BETTER quarterback, or is Weis just going to cover a sucking chest wound with a band-aid?
There's a difference between helping Cassel become a franchise QB, and masking his deficiencies and making him look good on the surface.
|
Or we could go into quantum theoretical analysis and state that if his deficiencies are masked rather than actually improved, and his on-field performance increases but no one from a casual observer perspective is able to differentiate between the two does it really matter either way?
If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound?