Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefsfan987
Thats true, but if I'm the Pac 10 I'd take Kansas. Its a stronger brand, brings in more revenue, and heck, you can add Utah any time. Because of its location the eastern conferences will never make a play for it. If expansion goes beyond 16 teams in the future, then is when I'd make my play for Utah if I'm the Pac 10.
|
One thing you need to take into account is:
Population of Utah in 1990: 1.7 million
Population of Utah now: 2.7 million
Population of Kansas in 1990: 2.5 million
Population of Kansas now: 2.8 million
It would be a tough decision for the Pac-10 still though, because Kansas does make more money than Utah right now and carries a traditional powerhouse in basketball. Actually, I changed my mind. Either way they go, it's a good choice. I'm obviously biased for Kansas though.