Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I never said it was all Lee's fault.
You asked what game the Husker's would've won with Gabbert at QB that they lost with Lee.
They'd have won that game with Gabbert. Does that mean the L was on Lee? No, not precisely. But it means that had Gabbert played his worst game of the season on that night, the Huskers still win it.
But before we get too far off base, I need to summarize your recent arguments for the record:
1) That despite the fact that Gabbert is stronger, faster, and ran for more yards than Lee (while injured, no less), Lee is in fact a dual threat QB while Gabbert is evidently a statue.
2) That despite the fact that Lee threw 3 picks, no TDs and completed 6 of 18 passes for a whopping 30 yards, Nebraska couldn't have managed to put an extra 2 points on the board with a QB that never had a game anywhere approaching the game that Lee put up and, in fact, threw for a TD with no picks against the same team.
Sound about right?
|
What I am saying is Gabbert is a pocket passing QB. He wouldn't have been nearly as productive at Nebraska with Nebraska's inconsistant o-line, banged up Rb's, and talentless WR's.
How does Gabbert get the Huskers more offense if the WR's couldn't get off the LOS?