Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX
I don't disagree.
However, from a coach's point of view, there is more to the evaluation process than a long-distance assessment of which player is "better" from a talent perspective, Mr. OnTheWarpath58. I mean, they have to know the playbook, practice with consistency, prove their ability to deal with adversity, etc.
Although I've disagreed with many of the current regime's player decisions (particularly in respect to the o-line), I have to admit that I lack a complete, comprehensive picture of those players' ability to contribute.
It reasonable to assume that, for every thing we think we know about a player, there are ten things we don't know.
FAX
|
I agree to an extent, Mr. FAX.
However, this regime has shown that they struggle to evaluate "talent" that's been right under their nose - forget long distance.
See: Cassel, Matt. Brown, Mike. Long, Lance. Vrabel, Mike. Etc.
Pioli's not the only decision maker in pro sports that have ****ed up by placing more importance on having "his guys" over more talented players, and he won't be the last.
That doesn't make it excusable, however.