[Saccopoo]

Originally Posted by Great Expectations

I wonder if we watched the same game. Cassel was much better, but to say he put the throws exactly where he needed to is silly.

How is it silly? He did. The throws were crisp and on target for the majority. To say that's "silly" is, in fact, silly.

I thought Jones showed a little burst cutting up field and looks to be able to pick up tough short yards.

That is correct. He did. However, his fumble was "ugly." That's why he wasn't listed in the "Bad" section, just the "Ugly" section.

Also, Flowers missing on one play isn't that big of a deal, we already know he is good.

It resulted in a touchdown. If that's "isn't that big of a deal," I don't know what it. What would be a "big deal" to you in terms of a cornerback ****ing up a play?

And see above. It was one of two "ugly" plays that the Chiefs had that resulted in points for the opposition. That's "ugly" in football terms.

I didn't notice Albert being that bad, I thought our line did much better.

They did. Weigmann played quite well. Lilja was okay. Surprisingly, Seamus O'Murphy actually had a decent game. Waters looked slow. However, Albert sucked. He whiffed on a lot of blocks, was constantly on the ground and was stood up repeatedly. He is unable to recover once he commits to a certain direction. I watched the game twice, and he was, without question, the worst of our staters on the offensive line.