Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus
Not going to bother to quote all your post.
1. Atlanta did not have huge succes their first 2 years with a ton of new players. You haven't shown anything to prove that and showed you a huge list of leftover players on that team.
2. The original comment I made was in regard to KC talent being based off of leftover players. As I stated and still believe that is typical.
3. Tampa may be younger than KC and may be an exception but the exception proves the rule. It's still an exception. I used the word rarely.
4. The Lions are better than their usual selves but still have not officially broken through. Sorry they are not in the playoff hunt nor do they look imminently close. Yes improved but that's not a massive suprise. The team has had how many high round picks the last 10 years? How could they not improve at some point?
5. Good night.
|
So, you conceded that both Tampa Bay and Detroit are far more talented in year two of their new regimes but contend that your statement is still correct?
And many (if not all) of Matt Millen's high draft choices are gone from Detroit, which further weakens your argument.