Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower
Circular Logic. I did not think the previous 16 games were an indication (proof) of Matty's potential back in April. I argued this and was berated for suggesting that perhaps there were ALSO other flaws with this team that prevented Matty from performing up to his potential.
If you thought the previous 16 games were proof, then obviously you were WRONG. Weren't you?
|
You don't even know what a tautology is. Although past results do not indicate future performance, they are a far more accurate indicator than "I hope he does b/c of the Arrowhead."
Furthermore, you lose your logical fallacy playing card, because you aren't even smart enough to realize that you are using an extremely small sample size to validate an entire player's career.
20 games and two offseasons? Makes sense. 2 games? **** off.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
|