Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoJC
Well I can't help it, even this post makes it hard for me to believe you are a Buckeye fan. You think the team that got beat by Florida was better? Umm it wasn't even a thought in any Buckeye fans mind, that was one of the most talented Buckeye Teams ever.
The reason it's hard for me to believe you are a fan is because most of your posts are illogical and pretty dumb. It's like you are trying to guess about stuff that you don't know, hence my doubt of your following. I didn't say you have to drink any kool-aid to be a fan, but if you're going to start posting some dumb stuff about my favorite team and you really don't know what you're talking about I will call you on it.
There is a difference between Ohiobronco and I having a dispute, because he knows his stuff about the Buckeyes. Most of your posts just aren't smart, my last point, our schedule wasn't that patsy, we beat a ranked Purdue, Penn State, and a good Michigan team that year, but I digress.
|
I don't follow the Buckeyes as much as I follow the Chiefs. But anybody outside of you two will confirm everything I'm saying. You're just looking at everything with rose-colored glasses. The Big 10 was pattycake for years but was very competitive last season, where they dominated their bowl games. This is a defense that is going to lose a ton of talent in the secondary and that is going to lose Cameron Heyward, which is huge, given how much attention offenses are devoting to him. And Pryor has been inconsistent in big games.
I think the Bucks next season with Pryor for a full season would have been a longshot for the BCS championship game with a decent chance of making a BCS Bowl with the greater likelihood that they'd be a 2-3 loss team. I'm sorry if realism is seen by you as hating, but I can guarantee you that 99% of the people who don't drink the kool-aid will say the same thing and I assure you that they are not stupid observations.