Quote:
Originally Posted by Gif Horse
You wanna know why Charles > Foster?
1. Speed. Foster doesn't have the breakaway speed Charles does.
2. Supporting cast. If Charles had a QB like Schaub and a WR like Johnson making safeties back off, he would be a nightmare. Cassel and Bowe are good but not in that league yet. No one is playing eight in the box consistently against the Texans...against the Chiefs, it's standard operating procedure.
|
I'm not gonna say either Cassel or Bowe are Shaub and Johnson but those two are no slouches.
My reason for why Foster is better. He carries the team, Charles splits it.