View Single Post
Old 04-05-2011, 11:08 PM   #2
shirtsleeve shirtsleeve is offline
In your pants
 
shirtsleeve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: at work
Casino cash: $10004900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By View Post
Who said I agreed with it in principle? His argument was lousy. It wasn't just because he was arguing against a non-existent equation.

DUI does not cause you to swerve over the center line and hit an oncoming car head on. There are millions of DUI situations that don't end in a crossed yellow line and head on collision, and there are sober drivers who do cross the line and hit oncoming traffic.

DUI does not cause you to slam into the back of a parked car. There are millions of DUI situations that don't end with slamming into a parked car, and there are sober drivers who do hit parked cars.
Dues

Who's arguement is a lousy one? My arguement is about the constitutional presumption of innocence and the ability of asshats to circumvent laws while law abiding citizens suffer the constitutional violation of rights and pay taxes to yet another innefective government overlord...
Posts: 605
shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.shirtsleeve has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.
    Reply With Quote