Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedChief
I would have given him $30 million for 10 years. The club would have made that money back easily in marketing alone. He's becoming the face of baseball. He's on 60 mintues for crissakes. Sure in yeAr 7 he's not going to be hitting home runs like he does now. But people will still pay to see the great pujols bat. You can put a pujols tax on seats next year and no one will care.
|
i would have given him the money too. last year.
i'm just questioning whether the club will cheapen the deal offered to him after he has an off year.
i think it's possible that his chances of going to another team increases.
sec
__________________
"Mr. seclark. Wrong for gravy, wrong for jelly, wrong for biscuits."
-rj
"If every Planeteer who was disliked by another Planeteer stopped being a Planeteer we wouldn't have any Planeteers."
-rj
|