Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
Wow - talking a pretty big game for a guy that's mounting a lame horse, Chief.
By any objective measure (a couple of which have already been provided to you), Nebraska is a sub-standard academic institution. Oh, you could be given more sources if you'd like them; for instance Forbes placed the Nubs at 442 in the country, but it's really not worth the trouble.
Nebraska's academic program is, at it's very best, below average. The 'resources' required to prove it can be found in a local library or on google. The capacity to do so has apparently only alluded you, who failed to do a single bit of simple research before running your mouth.
You wrote a check your ass can't cash.
|
I didn't write any check, and mounted no horse. Nothing objective was provided for me. How is Nebraska's academic institution below average at best? What criteria were used to come to such a conclusion? Simply citing Forbes and US News (who were over 300 spots off from each other) doesn't provide objective fact. Taken together, that just tells me those rankings are inconsistent and incomplete.
You are biased. it shows by calling them the "nubs". Apparently a fair amount of people are butt hurt on here, but to simply pull out inconsistent rankings from two magazines does not equal objective evidence.
By the way, nothing "alluded" me. If you did some simply research before you ran your mouth, you would see you're looking for the word eluded. And you consider yourself an authority on higher education.