View Single Post
Old 09-19-2011, 04:46 PM   #21
whoman69 whoman69 is offline
The Master
 
whoman69's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Casino cash: $10004925
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcarus View Post
Yes. We need to draft a potentially great QB because a great QB can hide a lot of deficiencies on a team. Christ look at the Colts. With Peyton they're Super Bowl contenders. Without him they're contending to be the worst team in the league. That's how much difference a QB can potentially make. So we need to lose to get the best bet out there.
Is that what the Packers, Steelers, Saints and Patriots did? How did that work out for the Browns, 49ers, Texans and Raiders? In fact of all the # pick QB recently, name one besides Peyton that took their team to the SB. Before Manning you have to go back to Troy Aikman for a QB that took the team that drafted them #1 overall to the Super Bowl. So hoping that your team sucks enough to be worst team in the league is an idea that sucks.
__________________
-Watching Eddie Podolak
Quote:
Originally posted by Logical
When the boobs are a bouncin, the Chiefs will be trouncin
What the Raiders fan has said is true, our customs are different. What Al Davis has said is unimportant, and we do not hear his words.
Posts: 23,101
whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.whoman69 is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
    Reply With Quote