Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367
When the Chiefs signed Orton, I pointed out that statistically he's actually even worse than Cassel.
Even if Orton was 100% healthy--which he isn't--the Chiefs know what they have in him.
This is the time to find out what they have in the players they DON'T know about.
Not playing Stanzi is short-bus reeruned. And if I were a Chiefs fan I'd be absolutely ripshit.
|
Except they are nearly identical statistically.
Cassels
best year with the #1 WR corp in NE - 16 327 516 63.4 3,693 7.16 21 76 11 5 89.4
Ortons
second best year in Denver and 3 less games than Cassel - 13 293 498 58.8 3,653 7.34 20 71 9 1 87.5
I'll take Orton over Cassel any day.
Crennel is auditioning for the HC job. He is not going to start a rookie QB for 3 games.