Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
Yeah because they'd have him throw the ball even less.
Taking Trent Richardson would set this franchise back at least 3 more years.
|
How? We have given Cassel everything and yet he still sucks. If this team continues to be enamored with Cassel, we might as well make it so he has very little to actually do. If I felt this team actually valued the QB position or felt Cassel was garbage then I would be totally against the Richardson pick. Sadly though I think our horse is hitched with him, so we might as well make running it idiot proof for him. Getting Richardson does just that.