Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup
Now we are changing it to the entire conversation...
I asked you a direct question. If you would be happy with winning a WB every 40 to 50 years? You answered, Yes I would.
Now you are wanting to change that to the entire conversation where several posts later you said you wouldn't HATE for us to win 2,3, or 4. Then you added that you have to win ONE first.
|
Are you serious?
Let's make it clear:
If they win 1 every 40 years, I won't complain. At least, I got to see one.
If they could win more than 1, I'd love it.
But Scott's comment was CLEARLY that he would FOREGO winning one in order to win more than 1. That's not acceptable. You can't win 2 without winning 1. Period.