Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
But Scott's comment was CLEARLY that he would FOREGO winning one in order to win more than 1. That's not acceptable. You can't win 2 without winning 1. Period.
|
Not acceptable that he wants to win more than one SB? How do you forego winning one when you have to do that before you can win multiple?
He doesn't want to win just one and then not be able to sniff another one for 40 years. I agree with him on that. I want to be a perenial contender.