Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection
About 5th-6th sounds right, yes. It's quite clear that they are very much on MU's level considering they played them to a near draw on the road.
You are describing a very narrow-minded way of evaluating teams, without any emphasis put on context and schedule. The voters aren't supposed to vote on who the teams with the best records are. They're supposed to vote on who they perceive the best teams to be.
|
And what is the most considered factor is determining which teams are best? Record has to be the first factor, and then scheduling behind that.
A five loss team in the top five seems to be a bit much, I think they would be overated at that point.