Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Should be interesting.
You can't just **** with people and walk away.
Missouri has done a pretty stupid thing.
Figuring things out has never been MU's strength.
|
No, you see - you don't have to wait and see on anything here.
What you said made no sense. Not only did you misstate the proper cause of action, as near as I can tell you didn't actually state proper elements or standards of proof for
any real cause of action. I suppose you could stretch it into some kind of tortious interference claim or something, but even still that's probably more of an alternative cause of action than the one you'd actually proceed on (the BoK claim is far easier to make than a tort action would be).
No, you sound like an idiot and we know that in real time. Your analysis was about as useful as my dog banging away at the keyboard would have been. Regardless of how this ultimately plays out, you came nowhere near what the actual justifications for said outcome would be.
No need to wait and see - we can go ahead and call this one now: You are guilty of being a present, material, moron.