Originally Posted by AustinChief
I'll take a look at the file if you want.. but I doubt it proves much either way.
Doesn't it prove at the very least that the Obama administration didn't produce a document that 100% answer the question?
So why would they bother?
Moreover , you yourself admit that in order for these results to happen, a bizarre set of settings must have been used....OR the document could have been tampered with....its not just scan to bmp or tiff or even directly to pdf without some kind of software manipulation.
What is the more simple explanation? 1) The experts in the obama administration, in trying to lift the cloud of suspicion accidentally use a bizarre combination of file scanning and archival settings which just happen to make the document's layers appear such that you cant really tell if the document was really scanned or legitimate...and cannot be easily replicated or reproduced.or 2) someone has tampered with this document
So, doesn't this just seem dumb on their part?
It seems dumb to me, but hey you seem to know more than I do....