Quote:
Originally Posted by go bowe
so what?
since when has the law of regarding self-defense ever spelled out allowable vs. non-allowable specifics?
other than the use of a weapon or the like (zimmerman) hasn't the standard always been that of a reasonable man and not whether 1 finger or 2 were broken or whether a nose is bloody or *gasp* broken?
would a reasonable man in those circumstances have been in fear for his life because he got his nose broken? mr. z wouldn't want me on his jury...
|
The facts of the case aren't in, so you taking that position just shows that you're either too prejudiced or too stupid to sit on the jury.