Originally Posted by Wickedson
Every conference has their anchor schools. PAC has USC and UCLA.... SEC has Alabama and Florida.... Big 12 has Texas and Oklahoma.... BIG has Michigan and OSU.....
There's no situation that is different than any other.
The only reason I'm making an argument is that SG was claiming that Texas and OK were the only ones who weren't "better off". Well now the SEC schools have to split the same $$ with 2 more schools. Why aren't they now not "better off"?
It's just hypocritical. No big deal.
Contract renegotiations have already begun, the money being split will increase immensely in the very near future and will far surpass that of the Big 12. SEC sports are a far more valuable product than the Big 12 and the contracts will reflect that.