Originally Posted by R8ers
Going by what the evidence is pointing to and the witness accounts as well as the police report.
Witness accounts say they do not know which one was on top. Witness accounts can not identify which person was the aggressor. Why do you continue to state false truths?
It is Zimmerman's account that he was attacked and his account alone. Not any witness.
The police did not think the evidence pointed towards a self defense claim. They thought Zimmerman should be charged with manslaughter. The prosecutor did not say the evidence pointed towards self defense. IIRC It was clearly stated from the prosecutor that they didn't think there was enough evidence to charge Zimmerman. Not having enough evidence to charge and the evidence pointing towards self defense have 2 very different and distinct meanings