Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies
Draft Molk in the 3 or 4 and leave Hudson at guard. Same effect, helluva lower cost. Does not compute with DeCastro crowd...
Tannehill in the first, Chapman in the 2nd, 3rd gone in a trade up, 4th on Molk. We just completed our team, and should the picks pan out built a Super Bowl team.
|
Quote:
|
Pioli isn't a tard, so he's not going to take DeCastro at 11. In fact, there's little to not chance he'd take him at all. I don't care if we had a 5 year old starting at LG, there is no value whatsoever in taking a G that high. None.
|
First of all, I don't see Tannehill dripping to #11, so expect to give up more than a third to move up.
Also, nice to know that we are only these three players away from a Super Bowl team in Bewbies land. You know the place, right? Anybody can play offensive line as long as you have "somebody different" at QB. The offensive line is meaningless here.
I'm not going to argue DeCastro with you because you've been dropped on your head far too often in life. My words and DJ's words are lost on you.
There is no doubt that KC needs more help at QB. Tannehill might be that guy, but I doubt that we'll make the moves necessary to grab him.
So...the obvious move is the trade down, right Bewbies? A QB will be waiting for us next year...well, probably not since we're poised to be a Super Bowl team, right? Picking too late to get any of the good prospects next year.
Hmmm? That's a tough one.