View Single Post
Old 06-21-2012, 08:52 PM   #98
SPATCH SPATCH is offline
birth of spatch
 
SPATCH's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Casino cash: $10006207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus View Post
QBs not included I'd consider taking the Giants, Eagles, Falcons and Texans.

QBs included I'd take just about any other offense in the league.

Giants: not nearly as good at RB or TE

Eagles: have WRs to rival Chiefs. Not as good on O-Line or at TE. Charles & Hillis have edge over McCoy & whoever

Falcons: not as good at WR, RB, TE, or O-Line

Texans: better RBs, not as deep at WR, not as good at TE (Daniels is just as injury prone as Moeaki if you're going to argue that), not as good across O-Line.

**Edit** I like the offensive talent in Dallas.. maybe Philadelphia. I still take KC, though.

Last edited by SPATCH; 06-21-2012 at 09:00 PM..
Posts: 4,569
SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.SPATCH would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote