Quote:
Originally Posted by the_spatula
Giants: not nearly as good at RB or TE
Eagles: have WRs to rival Chiefs. Not as good on O-Line or at TE. Charles & Hillis have edge over McCoy & whoever
Falcons: not as good at WR, RB, TE, or O-Line
Texans: better RBs, not as deep at WR, not as good at TE (Daniels is just as injury prone as Moeaki if you're going to argue that), not as good across O-Line.
**Edit** I like the offensive talent in Dallas.. maybe Philadelphia. I still take KC, though.
|
I think you're being a bit of a homer. We are very talented, but so are other teams. We're also sporting a lot of question marks and potential. Not including health issues, who knows if Hillis and Baldwin will pan out? Not to mention Moeaki. He had a pretty good rookie season, but he's spent so much time off the field, we have no clue whether not he'll acclimate himself. Hell, even Hudson and Asamoah have only seen limited game time.
If everything went as well as it could, yes, I'd take the Chiefs over most other teams. But as of now, question marks and all, I'd still consider all the teams I mentioned and probably add Dallas, Atlanta, and maybe even Detroit.