Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
That's such a wildly ignorant statement.
It's. Not. Their. Job.
Ask any member of the NCAA and every last one of them will tell you that this is far more abhorrent than tattoos.
Now go ahead and ask a civil judge if he thinks the murderer trial down the hall is more critical to the continuation of polite society than the rent and possession case on their docket that day. I'm pretty sure I know the answer to that one, but tough shit - you're running the civil docket today, Judge. It's someone else's role to monitor the murder trials.
I swear to God, some people are simply incapable of engaging their brains right now. Even if the NCAA wanted to, there is nothing within their regulatory authority that allows them to punish a college for conduct committed by their employees, even employees associated with athletics, for non-athletic related activities. The NCAA does not have plenary police power here.
|
Jimmies are rustled...
Kidding. TBF, I was just having a bit of fun. I am aware that the NCAA has no power in this matter and shouldn't. It is a legal issue with our criminal justice system. Personally, the people I've had interactions with that have worked throughout the NCAA are generally good people who would definitely fit what you wrote (the exception being aisle monitors/ushers. pricks). That being said, the NCAA does tend to get its priorities screwy in regards to student athlete benefits and regulations. That is what I was poking fun at sarcastically.