Do we have the 2nd admendment in place to protect our rights to go hunting or is it supposed to be in place to ensure we keep our government under control?
I always think of the issue like this when anyone describes how I should be limited with my gun purchases. If I'm strictly a hunter then maybe my own defined requirements would be satisfied with guns that "gun control" folks prescribe, but if my reason is to keep my government in line...maybe not?
BTW, never owned a gun. Don't really plan to either. I just like to read what others think.