Originally Posted by Deberg_1990
I liked all the Brosnan Bonds except maybe the last one where it started to cross over into Roger Moore era Bond. I dont get why there has been revisionist hate against them? They all made a ton of money and were popular.
Ive noticed theres been some re-thinking over the years about Daltons Bond to a more positive light. I liked the two movies he did, but thought he was pretty bland and didnt really resonate much with audiences.
I liked The Living Daylights with Dalton as Bond. License to Kill was a complete trainwreck, bombed at the box office, and put Bond in hybernation for 6-7 years until they got Brosnan to take up the mantle.