Quote:
Originally Posted by qabbaan
Deadly force is deadly force. If someone decides to use it, there is no "amount" of deadly force that is justified. It's either justified or it isn't. One shot or a hundred are the same.
My question is just, why didn't they tase him instead. Tasers are for this situation, where it's too dangerous to subdue some violent nut job without using deadly force.
|
Because the dude was wielding a knife? Just how far away do you think you can taze someone from?