Originally Posted by FishingRod
I think you are searching for a consequence to support your personal feelings. Since everyone should be covered and preexisting conditions don’t really apply anymore would not allowing Gay marriage lower the spread of aids?
Really, do you think that Gays are going to honor, cherish, and remain monogomous to thier partners in a higher percentage than most straights?
I highly, and objectively doubt it. Therefore, the odds of at least one of them flying off the licentious rail and getting some of that bath house action is at least equal to a cheating straight getting some. I am merely looking at this as a mathemetician. You cannot convince me, that given the diseases propensity to be transmitted by blood contact with a fresh wound, that gay men are not more at risk based on how they like to take their sex.
You are also assuming, that gays will be perfectly honorable with their marrying practices. Suppose your young gay buddy comes down with HIV, and you are chatting it up at the bar. You are covered with great group coverage at your big corporate job. Solution!!! Eureka!!! Let's get married!, then you can get the coverage you need to fight it.
Not saying that there would be anything wrong with a rational, self serving indidual doing what they need to do to survive, it is only human, but from a mathematical standpoint, you are making a lot of assumptions about human beings that I find un credible to apply to the population at large, therefore, I can conclude with a great deal of certainty, that it is a "FACT", that engaging in high risk sexual behavior, inreases the health care costs of society. Gee, don't you want me or someone like me as Secretary of HHS, implementing Obamacare??? Big govt. rocks dude.