View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 12:22 PM   #35
FishingRod FishingRod is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Casino cash: $47276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcountry View Post
Really, do you think that Gays are going to honor, cherish, and remain monogomous to thier partners in a higher percentage than most straights?

I highly, and objectively doubt it. Therefore, the odds of at least one of them flying off the licentious rail and getting some of that bath house action is at least equal to a cheating straight getting some. I am merely looking at this as a mathemetician. You cannot convince me, that given the diseases propensity to be transmitted by blood contact with a fresh wound, that gay men are not more at risk based on how they like to take their sex..
Well we donít set the bar very high but, being male I would expect that gay men would be more likely than a heterosexual couples to have a partner stray because, we men are pretty much a pack of sluts. Not exacly news to most of us. Conversely a couple of Gay women I would probably guess their percentage of infidelity would be lower than that of a hetero couple for the same reason

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcountry View Post
You are also assuming, that gays will be perfectly honorable with their marrying practices. Suppose your young gay buddy comes down with HIV, and you are chatting it up at the bar. You are covered with great group coverage at your big corporate job. Solution!!! Eureka!!! Let's get married!, then you can get the coverage you need to fight it. ..
I do not perceive them to be any more honorable than any other couple and would assume it happen in a similar percentage as can and does happen now. You know with your Friend girl that has Cancer.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Calcountry View Post
Not saying that there would be anything wrong with a rational, self serving indidual doing what they need to do to survive, it is only human, but from a mathematical standpoint, you are making a lot of assumptions about human beings that I find un credible to apply to the population at large, therefore, I can conclude with a great deal of certainty, that it is a "FACT", that engaging in high risk sexual behavior, inreases the health care costs of society. Gee, don't you want me or someone like me as Secretary of HHS, implementing Obamacare??? Big govt. rocks dude.


Nothing to disagree with here except that if Homosexuals were allowed to marry. More would likely be monogamous than they are now, thus lowing the number of people exposed to HIV and more in theory would have health to care diagnose and treat it also lowing the exposure of others. As I have often said, Uncle Sam really should not be in the Marriage business in the first place but, if they just canít keep their big nose out of it, they are obligated not to be discriminatory in their meddling.
Posts: 3,133
FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.FishingRod Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote