I can't imagine that it swayed any votes even subconsciously.
"Conventional" wisdom is that it was a negative because it was the thing people were talking about rather than Mitt or Mitt's speech.
However, if it means that people won't remember Mitt's substance-free speech full of platitutes about parent's love and how the Rs all rallied around Pres. Obama with their support after the 2008 election, Clint was a net positive for him.
Originally Posted by petegz28
Did planes hit the 2 WTC towers? Yes. Ah but were they the airliners we were told they were? Evidence and physics seems to say NO!
What about the Pentagon?? Again it appears it would...defy physics.