Originally Posted by BigRedChief
no, 3% is doable. I'd like to see them rolled back to where they were under the R's hero, Regan.
The Reagan rates were a package deal. He wouldn't have supported the high top rate you're advocating combined with the breaks he agreed to give low income groups. Don't invoke Reagan unless you're actually advocating something he would have supported. Don't be BEP.
"After voters re-elected an administration that added five trillion dollars to the nationís debt, left 23 million Americans unemployed, surrendered Iraq to Americaís enemy Iran, and enabled the Muslim Brotherhood to gain control of the largest country in the Middle East, the one lesson Republicans should agree on is that elections are driven by emotions, not reason." - David Horowitz