Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
Because it's a close election and they can't afford to be Naderized by any 3P, especially one polling at 7% in some western states.
I mean it's not like they have a Ronald Reagan running to overcome one. Reagan had Anderson to contend with and still won in a landslide.
I hear Obama has the Electoral College edge currently.
I don't think Nader ever cost ANYONE an election...now Perot on the other hand...