Originally Posted by Amnorix
I don't view that one as significant and didn't even know the background (i.e. how long ago he ran it).
of course, that's the minor one compared to the appalling lie about bankrupt businesses, but there's no defense for that one so I can see why you ignored it.
Well, first of all, I picked one of the two examples that *you* bolded. I chose the one I knew the most about and could most easily explain.
Would it surprise you if I told you that I can explain the bankruptcy statement too and that the article you posted was arguably as misleading and most likely more intentionally deceptive than Ryan's statement?
Edit: I just re-read the article and I no longer think that it was intentionally deceptive.