Originally Posted by cosmo20002
So, at first they gave a statement based on what they knew at the time. Later, with new information, they revised the statement. Holy shit--worse than Watergate.
You have to ask yourself why "what they knew at the time" was so divergent from not just the undiscovered truth but also the common sense likelihoods? On the same day that Susan Rice was doing her Sgt. Schultz impression (I see NOTHING!), the President of Libya was telling a conflicting story (that both made sense given what we knew and was true).