Originally Posted by patteeu
You have to ask yourself why "what they knew at the time" was so divergent from not just the undiscovered truth but also the common sense likelihoods? On the same day that Susan Rice was doing her Sgt. Schultz impression (I see NOTHING!), the President of Libya was telling a conflicting story (that both made sense given what we knew and was true).
What about the congressional Dems who were saying it was terrorism immediately after they were briefed? Maybe the White House doesn't have access to this info?