Originally Posted by Literature
It's worse than your "Obama really just accepts [current policy formerly considered conservative] so he can get to [policy promoted by far left, with few implications with Obama] so we should do our duty to object to [current policy formerly considered conservative] even though it's a decent/good/workable/reasonable proposal."
Your whole political philosophy is based on a slippery slope theory, which you find inevitable unless we cut off the advance to the 'top of the hill.' Ex: Market-involved healthcare reform? Can't have it. Why? Because it will lead to socialism. Alternative? No reform at all. Result: millions still w/o insurance, health care costs continue to rise exponentially, nobody's happy, but at least we avoided the hypothetical socialism that could have hypothetically happened down the hypothetical road.
This post doesn't even make sense. No one outside of maybe the ronpauls has argued that the only alternative to Obamacare is no reform at all.
“[Cruz] might not be the most fun to have a drink at the bar with, but America needs a designated driver.” - Mica Mosbacher, wife of the late Robert Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce