Originally Posted by Literature
I love this. If that was the Republican compromise alternative, then what other reason is the Democratic acceptance of the compromise alternative now an anti-conservative proposal accept that the name of the supporting party has been switched? It went from "Here's an acceptable compromise" to "Oh, now that you took the compromise, we can call it an evil, anti-American piece of legislation that needs to be opposed/overturned/vilified."
What other reason besides partisan lines is the cause for this? It was tried and found not workable? Absolutely not.
As I mentioned in my last post, Obamacare was not lifted directly from the Heritage archives. It uses some of the same elements, but it's simplistic and no doubt wrong to conclude that they're essentially the same.
“[Cruz] might not be the most fun to have a drink at the bar with, but America needs a designated driver.” - Mica Mosbacher, wife of the late Robert Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce